Skip to main content
By clicking “Accept All Cookies”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyze site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts. View our Privacy Policy for more information.
Accept

Ask A Question

All responses are for general informational purposes only and are based on our experts’ knowledge and experience in the specific areas, both geographic and technical, in which we work. They are not intended to provide design recommendations and should not be relied on for design, investment, or other decisions. Always consult with your design expert for project specific recommendations.

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Effect of Caliche on the Behavior of Drilled Shafts

February 29, 2024

Dr. Rouzbeh Afshar recently joined the Twining family as a Project Engineer. He has over 4 years of experience performing soils and geotechnical engineering design, load testing of drilled shafts and complex analysis of deep and shallow foundation. We are pleased to present the following abstract from Dr. Afshar’s  thesis on the Effect of Caliche on the Behavior of Drilled Shafts.

The current test design methodology for a drilled shaft foundation is primarily based on ultimate skin friction values of drilled shafts. In order to obtain these values for each soil type, load tests such as Osterberg test are designed and performed. The Osterberg test layout is designed to estimate the capacity of drilled shaft by applying an upward load during the test and then calculating the downward capacity assuming the upward and downward capacity are the same. Dr. Afshar’s research showed in soils containing caliche, the ultimate skin friction is not achieved and shaft/caliche interaction is mostly elastic. In these cases, the behavior of the shaft when it is loaded from the bottom is different from when it is loaded from the top. His study explains that, the location of O-cell with respect to the caliche layers will influence the interpretation of test results.

The results of his study shows a test layout with O-cell at a location far from the caliche layers shown to have a higher capacity during conventional loading compared to interpreted test results from Osterberg load test. On the other hand, when O-cell is installed close to caliche, the top-down loading shows a similar behavior to interpreted test results from Osterberg load test.  In fact, when O-cell and caliche layers are close to each other, the test layout is similar to the procedure performed to estimate rock socketed drilled shafts capacity. The results of this study will help engineers to have better understanding of the drilled shafts behavior in soils containing caliche by introducing an appropriate test design and interpretation of the test results.

Rebar
Youtube

You May Also Like

Cover
October 16, 2024

Surcharge on Retaining Wall

This article provides a thorough examination of how lateral pressure on retaining walls is influenced by various types of surcharge loading. It covers essential topics, such as uniform, point, line, and strip loads, and includes guidelines from standards like Caltrans, AASHTO, and NAVFAC. The guide offers practical equations and methodologies for accurately calculating the impact of surcharge loads on both rigid and flexible retaining walls, considering traffic, construction equipment, and foundation loads. This detailed resource is invaluable for civil engineers involved in the design and construction of stable retaining walls.
Read more
Cover
September 24, 2024

Alkali-Silica Reaction (ASR): Understanding the Effects of ASR in Concrete Structures

Meredith Strows dives into the effects of Alkali-Silica Reaction and the importance of using petrographic examination.
Read more
Cover
September 3, 2024

Concrete Maturity Method

The Concrete Maturity Method is a non-destructive technique that estimates in-place concrete strength by correlating its age and temperature during curing. Developed in 1951 and recognized by ASTM C1074, this method provides real-time strength data, aiding in construction decisions like form stripping or paving openings. However, it has limitations, such as not accounting for variables like aggregate coatings that can affect strength. While not a replacement for traditional strength tests, the maturity method serves as a complementary tool, enhancing safety and the integrity of concrete structures.
Read more